Popsicle Makers a Security Threat
June 23rd, 2010 admin
Chicago chef Rick Bayless photographed this security sign, posted before airport security as people were returning home from the Aspen Food & Wine Festival: No popsicle makers are allowed through security. Anyone have any idea why something like this is so dangerous? Is the TSA prohibiting random things to toy with us? Their blog is silent on this question. EDITED…
Related Videos from Youtube
Bruce Schneier at EWI Cybersecurity...
TSA Safety with Bruce Schneier...12-28-2009 - Rachel Maddow - TSA Safety with Bruce Schneier
Bruce Schneier at The Rachel Maddow...Bruce Schneier at The Rachel Maddow Show (2009-12-28) Can gaps in security be filled? www.msnbc.msn.com
#IGF09 - Bruce Schneier...Bruce Schneier at the 4th Annual Meeting of the Internet Governance Forum in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. www.facebook.com www.twitter.com www.flickr.com Video Author: Seiiti Arata Provided under: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License creativecommons.org
Related Posts
Every so often I receive questions from blog readers. The latest centered on the following question: What level and extent should a security team and investigators be allowed to operate without having to ask for permission? This is an excellent question, and as with most issues of authority it depends on the organization, its history, culture,...
This sign is from a gas station in the U.K. My first reaction was to laugh, but then I started thinking about it. We know that signs like “No Shoplifting” reduce shoplifting in the area around the sign, but those are warnings against a specific crime. Could a sign this general be effective? Clearly some comparative studies are needed…....
What could possibly be the point of this? Cars heading to Austin-Bergstrom International Airport will see random, voluntary inspections Monday. The searches are part of an increase in security at the airport. It’s a joint operation between the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Austin Police, and airport security. The enhancements are not...
In my last post I mentioned the need to take threat-centric approaches to advanced persistent threat . No sooner than I had posted those thoughts do I read this: Beijing ’strongly indignant’ about U.S.-Taiwan arms sale The Obama administration announced the sale Friday of $6 billion worth of Patriot anti-missile systems, helicopters,...
The idea of finding vulnerabilities in tools used by attackers is not new. It’s part of the larger question of aggressive network self defense that I first discussed here in 2005 when reviewing a book of that title. (The topic stretches back to 2002 and before, before this blog was born.) If you follow my blog’s offense label you’ll...
Related Tweets from Twitter
|
malbolgia (malbolgia) : RT @schneierblog: The Onion on National Security: "Smart, Qualified People Behind the Scenes Keeping America Safe: 'We Don't Exist'"...
ht.. Updated : 2010-09-10T18:50:42Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
amarshall_ASI (Ashley Marshall) : The Onion on National Security http://bit.ly/b1uMxW.. Updated : 2010-09-10T18:47:04Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
scottalbro (Scott Albro) : If it's in the news, don't worry about it via @schneier (0 tweets!) http://t.co/DkPllH0.. Updated : 2010-09-10T18:40:37Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
esimmers (Erich Simmers) : Apologies in advance RT @schneierblog: "Smart, Qualified People Behind the Scenes Keeping USA Safe: 'We Don't Exist'" http://bit.ly/cI2Q1u.. Updated : 2010-09-10T18:38:48Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
slonob (Jarrod Stenberg) : RT @schneierblog: The Onion on National Security: "Smart, Qualified People Behind the Scenes Keeping America Safe: 'We Don't Exist'"...
ht.. Updated : 2010-09-10T18:34:48Z | Reply | View Tweet |
Related News from Digg
Leave a comment
| Trackback
