Answering APT Misconceptions
February 5th, 2010 admin

There’s finally some good reporting on advanced persistent threat appearing in various news sources. A new Christian Science Monitor story, one by Federal Computer Week , and one by Wired are making progress in raising awareness. Unfortunately, there’s plenty of Tweeting and blogging by people who refuse to understand what is happening or are not capable of understanding what is happening. From now on, rather than repeat myself trying to answer these misconceptions, I decided to consolidate them here. Myth 1. APT is a “new term,” invented by Mandiant. Reality: Mandiant did not invent the term. The Air Force did in 2006. …
Related Posts
Ally Bank wants its customers to invent their own personal secret questions and answers; the idea is that an operator will read the question over the phone and listen for an answer. Ignoring for the moment the problem of the operator now knowing the question/answer pair, what are some good pairs? Some suggestions: Q: Do you know why I think…...
While I’m sure Mikko Hypponen, Chief Research Officer at F-Secure , is getting as tired as hearing the term APT* as the rest of us are, he had some insight into what’s really happening with this threat and the fact that it’s not something new, it’s just the acknowledgment that it’s happening that’s new.
Read More →
On the New York Times Room for Debate Blog, I — along with several other people — was asked about how to prevent terrorist attacks in crowded areas. This is my response. In the wake of Saturday’s failed Times Square car bombing, it’s natural to ask how we can prevent this sort of thing from happening again. The answer is…...
This has been the week to discuss the advanced persistent threat , although some people are already telling me Google v China with respect to APT is “silly,” or that the attack vectors were what everyone has been talking about for years, and were somewhat sloppily orchestrated at that. I think many of these critics are missing the...
In a recent Tweet I recommended reading Joe Stewart’s insightful analysis of malware involved in Google v China . Joe’s work is stellar as always, but I am reading more and more commentary that shows many people don’t have the right frame of reference to understand this problem. In brief, too many people are focusing on the malware...
Related Tweets from Twitter
|
_1stLADYDUTCH (DUTCHESS) : Gettin ready to head back to Laffy!!! I be lowkey ready to go back to my apt everytime I come to Patterson!!.. Updated : 2010-09-04T14:37:03Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
Averiana (MsParalegal) : I cleaned the whole apt last nite and I get up this morning and my homegirl has messed up the dishes again!!.. Updated : 2010-09-04T14:36:55Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
JaiY0 ( J? A? I? ) : ......somebodys in a good mood this a.m. *sprints around apt nakeed* lol.. Updated : 2010-09-04T14:36:30Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
stefffer (Stef P) : @Momtobradyn we're lost driving back to A's apt, so we're just seeing her rage right now. Haha. But excited for baseball & crabcake tonight!.. Updated : 2010-09-04T14:36:07Z | Reply | View Tweet |
|
Meligy (Mohamed Meligy) : @mShady :D :D, u win. didn't hear the 2nd. &I won't until Monday or so. The Internet at temp apt is limited to 100MB/day (me+wife=1 account).. Updated : 2010-09-04T14:35:50Z | Reply | View Tweet |
Related News from Digg
Leave a comment
| Trackback























